Introduction
Little consideration has been paid to the affect of individually measured social determinants of well being on most cancers screening exams within the Medicaid inhabitants.
Strategies
Evaluation was carried out on 2015–2020 claims knowledge from a subgroup of Medicaid enrollees from the District of Columbia Medicaid Cohort Research (N=8,943) who have been eligible for colorectal (n=2,131), breast (n=1,156), and cervical most cancers (n= 5,068) screening. Members have been grouped into 4 distinct social determinants of well being teams on the premise of their responses to social determinants of well being questionnaire. This research estimated the affect of the 4 social determinants of well being teams on the receipt of every screening take a look at utilizing log-binomial regression adjusted for demographics, sickness severity, and neighborhood-level deprivation.
Outcomes
The receipt of most cancers screening exams was 42%, 58%, and 66% for colorectal, cervical, and breast most cancers, respectively. These in essentially the most deprived social determinants of well being group have been much less prone to obtain a colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy than these within the least deprived one (adjusted RR=0.70, 95% CI=0.54, 0.92). The sample for mammograms and Pap smears was related (adjusted RR=0.94, 95% CI=0.80, 1.11 and adjusted RR=0.90, 95% CI=0.81, 1.00, respectively). In distinction, members in essentially the most deprived social determinants of well being group have been extra prone to obtain fecal occult blood take a look at than these within the least deprived one (adjusted RR=1.52, 95% CI=1.09, 2.12).
Conclusions
Extreme social determinants of well being measured on the particular person degree are related to decrease most cancers preventive screening. A focused method that addresses the social and financial adversities that have an effect on most cancers screening may lead to larger preventive screening charges on this Medicaid inhabitants.
INTRODUCTION
,
Most cancers within the district.
Breast most cancers is essentially the most generally recognized most cancers and the second commonest explanation for most cancers deaths, whereas colorectal most cancers is the fourth mostly recognized and the third explanation for most cancers deaths for each men and women nationwide.
,
Most cancers within the district.
, ,
- Islami F
- Ward EM
- Sung H
- et al.
, , , Individuals with extra schooling and better incomes typically have decrease most cancers loss of life charges than others, besides, they might expertise disparities owing to their race or ethnicity: Blacks have the best most cancers loss of life fee of all racial teams no matter socioeconomic place.,
- Murphy KA
- Daumit GL
- McGinty EE
- Stone EM
- Kennedy-Hendricks A.
,
- Goudie A
- Martin B
- Li C
- et al.
,
- Bonafede MM
- Miller JD
- Pohlman SK
- et al.
,
,
- Davis MM
- Renfro S
- Pham R
- et al.
,
- Kurani SS
- McCoy RG
- Lampman MA
- et al.
Early detection may also cut back remedy and healthcare prices, together with to the Medicaid program.
- Homan SG
- Yun S
- Bouras A
- Schmaltz C
- Gwanfogbe P
- Lucht J.
Since 2010, private and non-private insurers should cowl preventive companies beneficial by the U.S. Preventive Companies Activity Pressure, for which there’s excessive or average certainty that the web profit is substantial (i.e., Grade A) or average (i.e., Grade B).,
- Markus A
- Gerstein M
- Gunsalus R.
Nonetheless, population- and state-based analyses of claims knowledge present decrease charges of most cancers screening amongst Medicaid enrollees than amongst commercially insured people.
- Goudie A
- Martin B
- Li C
- et al.
,
- Bonafede MM
- Miller JD
- Pohlman SK
- et al.
,
,
- Davis MM
- Renfro S
- Pham R
- et al.
Decrease screening charges amongst Medicaid enrollees are worrisome as a result of they expertise disproportionate most cancers incidence and mortality.
- Pan HY
- Walker GV
- Grant SR
- et al.
- Alcaraz KI
- Wiedt TL
- Daniels EC
- Yabroff KR
- Guerra CE
- Wender RC.
SDH are the nonmedical components that affect well being outcomes. SDH embrace the circumstances by which individuals are born, develop, work, reside, and age in addition to the broader set of financial insurance policies and techniques, social norms, social insurance policies, and political techniques that form them. Though quite a lot of research have evaluated the position of well being insurance policies (i.e., expanded protection, copayments, supplier reimbursement) on most cancers screening charges within the Medicaid inhabitants, few have examined the affect of SDH components. The aim of this paper is to estimate the affect of an combination set of individually measured SDH components on the most cancers screening charges of a cohort of adults insured by the District of Columbia (DC) Medicaid program, controlling for demographics, illness severity, and area-level deprivation. Most cancers screening take a look at completion was hypothesized to be decrease amongst Medicaid enrollees with essentially the most social and financial adversities than amongst these with the fewest.
METHODS
- McCarthy ML
- Zheng Z
- Wilder ME
- Elmi A
- Li Y
- Zeger SL.
and examined the connection between SDH grouped into 4 distinct social danger teams and the receipt of screening exams for 3 cancers. The research recognized members eligible for a colorectal (n=2,131), breast (n=1,156), and/or cervical (n=5,068) most cancers screening take a look at on the premise of the U.S. Preventive Companies Activity Pressure suggestions
,
,
and decided completion of a colorectal, breast, and cervical most cancers screening take a look at as outlined within the Healthcare Effectiveness Information and Data Set pointers. Separate fashions have been developed utilizing Medicaid claims over a 4-year interval for the receipt of at the least 1 colorectal, breast, and cervical most cancers screening take a look at as a perform of social danger group, age, intercourse, morbidity burden, having an everyday medical supplier, size of Medicaid protection, and neighborhood deprivation.
Research Pattern
- McCarthy ML
- Zheng Z
- Wilder ME
- Elmi A
- Li Y
- Zeger SL.
Determine 1Derivation of research teams.
Measures
The evaluation excluded fecal immunochemical take a look at or computed tomography colonography as a result of the research pattern didn’t embrace any claims for these exams. As a result of solely 0.3% of members had a versatile sigmoidoscopy through the 4-year interval, the evaluation mixed it with colonoscopy. For breast most cancers, the beneficial screening is a biennial mammogram for ladies aged between 50 and 75 years. For cervical most cancers, the beneficial screening is a Papanicolaou smear with out human papillomavirus testing each 3 years for ladies aged <30 years or a Pap with human papillomavirus testing each 5 years for ladies aged 30–65 years.
,
The structural determinants measured have been race, schooling, and employment standing; the middleman determinants included materials circumstances (e.g., residence sort, housing instability, meals insecurity, monetary pressure), well being behaviors (e.g., smoking, illicit drug, and alcohol use), and psychosocial components (e.g., loneliness, marital standing, dwelling with kids, historical past of being in jail/jail) (Appendix Determine 1, accessible on-line, reveals the baseline SDH evaluation).
- McCarthy ML
- Zheng Z
- Wilder ME
- Elmi A
- Li Y
- Zeger SL.
- McCarthy ML
- Zheng Z
- Wilder ME
- Elmi A
- Li Y
- Zeger SL.
All SDH components have been dichotomized to make them simpler to interpret the category answer. LCA fashions with 2–6 class options have been run owing to the necessity for a comparatively small variety of latent courses for ease of interpretation. LCA assigns people to courses on the premise of their likelihood of being in courses in response to the sample of scores they’ve on the indicator variables, on this research, the SDH components.
- McCarthy ML
- Zheng Z
- Wilder ME
- Elmi A
- Li Y
- Zeger SL.
The ADI ranges from 1 to 100. The upper the rating, the more severe the realm deprivation. This research grouped members into 4 classes on the premise of the ADI quartile distribution within the guardian cohort.
common medical suppliers, and Medicaid protection length through the 4-year research interval, along with age and intercourse. The Adjusted Medical Teams system makes use of ICD-10 prognosis and pharmacy codes from administrative billing knowledge (the Medicaid claims for a 2-year interval earlier than research enrollment on this research) to quantify illness burden on the premise of medical components, such because the probability or persistence of a situation, the severity of the situation, diagnostic certainty, etiology, and the sorts of healthcare companies required.
An indicator variable of whether or not the participant had an everyday physician was included on the premise of a query within the baseline SDH evaluation. The Medicaid eligibility claims file was used to find out every participant’s Medicaid protection standing through the 4-year research interval.
Statistical Evaluation
First, the connection between the receipt of at the least 1 colonoscopy and/or sigmoidoscopy, FOBT, mammogram, or Papanicolaou smear and adversarial SDH (i.e., social danger group), age, intercourse, length of Medicaid protection, illness burden, having an everyday medical supplier, and ADI quartile was assessed utilizing a chi-square take a look at of homogeneity. Second, the correlation between social danger group and the opposite danger components was estimated. Third, the receipt of every most cancers screening take a look at was modeled individually as a perform of social danger group, ADI quartile, illness burden, age, intercourse, length of Medicaid protection, and having an everyday medical supplier utilizing log-binomial regression. As a result of social danger group had a meaningfully totally different affiliation with the receipt of colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy versus FOBT, every was modeled individually.
As a result of there was a powerful relationship between social danger group and having an everyday medical supplier, fashions have been rerun with out the common medical supplier variable to estimate the connection between social danger group and receipt of the most cancers screening exams much less conservatively. All analyses have been accomplished utilizing SAS 9.4 and R, Model 4.0.1.
RESULTS
Throughout the 4-year research interval, the receipt of a colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy or FOBT was 42% among the many 2,131 members eligible for colorectal most cancers screening. Extra members obtained a colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy (26%) than FOBT (13%), and few obtained each (4%). Among the many 271 members who solely obtained an FOBT, 5 obtained an annual FOBT through the 4-year interval.
Among the many feminine members, 66% of the 1,156 eligible members obtained at the least 1 mammogram through the research interval, and 39% obtained at the least 2 mammograms. Barely greater than half (58%) of the 5,068 ladies eligible for cervical most cancers screening obtained at the least 1 Papanicolaou smear.
Desk 1Share Distribution of Receipt of Preventive Companies by Completely different Danger Elements
Be aware: Boldface signifies statistical significance (p<0.05)
Statistical significance is between every danger issue and the receipt of the precise most cancers screening take a look at. All values are n (%).
Desk 2Share Distribution of Social Danger Group by Completely different Danger Elements for Colorectal Screening Group (N=2,131)
Be aware: Boldface signifies statistical significance (p<0.05).
Statistical significance is between every danger issue and social danger group. All values are n (%).
Desk 3Adjusted RR (95% CI) of Receiving Most cancers Screening Check Throughout 4-12 months Research Interval
Be aware: Boldface signifies statistical significance (p<0.05).
Statistical significance is between social danger group and receipt of most cancers screening take a look at.
Neighborhood socioeconomic drawback as measured by the ADI was not related to the receipt of most cancers screening apart from cervical most cancers (knowledge not proven). Feminine members who lived within the second and third ADI quartiles have been much less prone to obtain a Pap smear than ladies dwelling within the least deprived neighborhood quartile (aRR=0.90, 95% CI=0.84, 0.97 and aRR=0.94, 95% CI=0.88, 0.99 respectively).
DISCUSSION
This research evaluated the affect of a complete set of adversarial SDH measured on the particular person degree on the receipt of colorectal, breast, and most cancers screening exams in an grownup pattern of Medicaid enrollees. Members with worse SDH have been much less prone to obtain the beneficial most cancers screening exams than these with the fewest social dangers.
- Murphy KA
- Daumit GL
- McGinty EE
- Stone EM
- Kennedy-Hendricks A.
,
- Bonafede MM
- Miller JD
- Pohlman SK
- et al.
,
- Mobley LR
- Subramanian S
- Tangka FK
- et al.
and Pap smears.
- Murphy KA
- Daumit GL
- McGinty EE
- Stone EM
- Kennedy-Hendricks A.
The share of members who accomplished colonoscopy or FOBT was larger than in a number of research
- Murphy KA
- Daumit GL
- McGinty EE
- Stone EM
- Kennedy-Hendricks A.
,
,
- Davis MM
- Renfro S
- Pham R
- et al.
however decrease than in at the least 1 research.
- Bonafede MM
- Miller JD
- Pohlman SK
- et al.
Findings present that entry to complete medical insurance protection is just not sufficient to remove disparities within the receipt of most cancers screening exams amongst people of low earnings. Social danger group considerably influenced each sorts of colorectal most cancers exams and was borderline important for breast and cervical most cancers screening.
- Mendoza JA
- Miller CA
- Martin KJ
- et al.
low well being literacy,
- Sentell T
- Braun KL
- Davis J
- Davis T.
,
- Sentell TL
- Tsoh JY
- Davis T
- Davis J
- Braun KL.
restricted English proficiency,
- Sentell T
- Braun KL
- Davis J
- Davis T.
and homelessness
- Asgary R
- Garland V
- Jakubowski A
- Sckell B.
are related to a decrease proportion of people finishing a most cancers screening take a look at throughout the beneficial interval. Though this research didn’t consider the impression of every SDH issue individually, the 4 social danger teams signify people who fluctuate meaningfully by way of structural determinants of well being inequities (e.g., academic degree, employment standing) and middleman determinants (e.g., smoking, meals insecurity, housing instability, monetary pressure).
- Pruitt SL
- Shim MJ
- Mullen PD
- Vernon SW
- Amick BC.
One cause for the inconsistent outcomes could also be that the majority previous research measure SDH at one degree however not each. For instance, Kurani et al.
- Kurani SS
- McCoy RG
- Lampman MA
- et al.
reported that the percentages of finishing most cancers screening exams have been considerably decrease amongst people dwelling in essentially the most disadvantaged census block quintile than within the least disadvantaged. Nonetheless, they didn’t management for individual-level SDH components apart from age, intercourse, and race/ethnicity.
- Kurani SS
- McCoy RG
- Lampman MA
- et al.
In distinction, Akinlotan and colleagues
- Akinlotan MA
- Weston C
- Bolin JN.
discovered that when they managed for individual-level family earnings, schooling, and race/ethnicity, area-level measures of poverty and race weren’t considerably related to cervical most cancers screening. This research’s outcomes suggest that SDH components measured on the particular person degree are the extra essential determinants of completion of most cancers screening exams.
- Markus A
- Gerstein M
- Gunsalus R.
an method discovered to be cost-effective.
Nonetheless, it must be emphasised that only a few members accomplished the FOBT take a look at yearly. If the standards had been annual FOBT, the connection between FOBT and social danger group couldn’t have been examined.
Limitations
This research has limitations. First, the 4-year research interval is brief, significantly for colorectal most cancers screening. Second, not all members have been lined by Medicaid for the whole interval, which can have resulted in underestimating adherence. This research may have overestimated most cancers screening take a look at completion if some procedures have been carried out for diagnostic moderately than screening functions. Third, claims don’t embrace info on the extent to which low most cancers screenings resulted from the absence of specialist referrals. Fourth, the research might have didn’t exclude (a possible small variety of) members who had a disqualifying medical process earlier than the 2-year prestudy enrollment interval. Fifth, the SDH info was not collected yearly, which can have resulted in some misclassification as a result of circumstances can change over the 4-year interval. Moreover, this research evaluated the affect of an aggregated set of SDH moderately than particular determinants. `Sixth, the research pattern was recognized on the time of a healthcare encounter, consisting primarily of Black enrollees who have been very sick, so generalizability is proscribed. Lastly, knowledge are earlier than coronavirus illness 2019 (COVID-19), precluding an evaluation of COVID-19 on most cancers screening take a look at completion.
CONCLUSIONS
Amongst a pattern of adults lined by the identical public insurance coverage program, social and financial disadvantages have been related to the receipt of most cancers screening exams, signifying extra limitations to accessing beneficial preventive care. To scale back cancer-related disparities, state Medicaid businesses have to systematically assess SDH amongst their members and use the outcomes to hunt options in collaboration with their enrollees, the healthcare system, and different service sectors. Medicaid should present extra infrastructure, sources, and help for extra focused motion knowledgeable by these assessments to realize well being fairness.
CrediT AUTHOR STATEMENT
Anne Markus: Conceptualization, Formal evaluation, Writing – unique draft, Writing – evaluate & enhancing. Melissa McCarthy: Conceptualization, Formal evaluation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – unique draft, Writing – evaluate & enhancing. Yixuan Li: Information curation, Formal evaluation, Software program, Visualization, Writing – unique draft. Marceé Wilder: Validation, Writing – evaluate & enhancing. Killian Catalnotti: Validation, Writing – evaluate & enhancing.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors want to acknowledge Lydia Abma, who offered analysis help to this mission whereas she was enrolled within the MPH in Well being Coverage program within the Division of Well being Coverage and Administration at The George Washington College Milken Institute College of Public Well being.
This research took benefit of knowledge collected as a part of a potential cohort research, often known as the DC Medicaid Cohort Research GW IRB#081728.
This evaluation was made attainable by the Nationwide Institute on Minority Well being and Well being Disparities (Grant Quantity R01MD011607).
Appendix. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
REFERENCES
-
Deaths and mortality.
Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention. January 13, 2022; ()
-
An replace on most cancers deaths in the US.
Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention. February 28, 2022; ()
-
Most cancers within the district.
DC Well being,
Washington, DC2018 () -
Widespread most cancers sorts.
Nationwide Most cancers Institute,
Could 10, 2022 () -
Annual report back to the nation on the standing of most cancers, half 1: nationwide most cancers statistics.
J Natl Most cancers Inst. 2021; 113: 1648-1669https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djab131
-
Most cancers stat information: feminine breast most cancers. NIH, Nationwide Most cancers Institute, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Finish Outcomes Program. https://seer.most cancers.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html. Accessed August 22, 2022.
-
Most cancers stat information: cervical most cancers. NIH, Nationwide Most cancers Institute, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Finish Outcomes Program. https://seer.most cancers.gov/statfacts/html/cervix.html. Accessed August 22, 2022.
-
Most cancers stat information: colorectal most cancers. NIH, Nationwide Most cancers Institute, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Finish Outcomes Program. https://seer.most cancers.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html. Accessed August 22, 2022.
-
Most cancers disparities. Nationwide Most cancers Institute. https://www.most cancers.gov/about-cancer/understanding/disparities. Accessed December 10, 2022.
-
Most cancers stat information: most cancers disparities. NIH, Nationwide Most cancers Institute, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Finish Outcomes Program. https://seer.most cancers.gov/statfacts/html/disparities.html. Accessed August 22, 2022.
-
Predictors of most cancers screening amongst Black and White Maryland Medicaid enrollees with severe psychological sickness.
Psycho-Oncology. 2021; 30: 2092-2098https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5815
-
Larger charges of preventive well being care with industrial insurance coverage in contrast with Medicaid: findings from the Arkansas Well being Care Independence “Non-public Possibility” Program.
Med Care. 2020; 58: 120-127https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001248
-
Breast, cervical, and colorectal most cancers screening: patterns amongst ladies with Medicaid and industrial insurance coverage.
Am J Prev Med. 2019; 57: 394-402https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.04.010
-
Medicaid major care doctor charges and using preventive companies amongst Medicaid enrollees.
Well being Serv Res. 2014; 49: 1306-1328https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12169
-
Geographic and population-level disparities in colorectal most cancers testing: a multilevel evaluation of Medicaid and industrial claims knowledge.
Prev Med. 2017; 101: 44-52https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.001
-
Affiliation of neighborhood measures of social determinants of well being with breast, cervical, and colorectal most cancers screening charges within the U.S. Midwest.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3 ()https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0618
-
Breast most cancers inhabitants screening program leads to early detection and decreased remedy and well being care prices for Medicaid.
J Public Well being Manag Pract. 2021; 27: 70-79https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001041
-
42 U.S. Code § 300gg–13 – protection of preventive well being companies. Ithaca, NY: Authorized Data Institute. https://www.legislation.cornell.edu/uscode/textual content/42/300gg-13. Printed March 23, 2010. Accessed August 9, 2022.
-
An Evaluation of Disparities in Reported Most cancers Screening Behaviors within the DC Area by Insurance coverage Standing, Age, and Earnings – Last Report.
The George Washington College Most cancers Heart,
Washington, DC2019 -
Insurance coverage standing and racial disparities in cancer-specific mortality in the US: a population-based evaluation.
Most cancers Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017; 26: 869-875https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0976
-
Understanding and addressing social determinants to advance most cancers well being fairness in the US: a blueprint for observe, analysis, and coverage.
CA Most cancers J Clin. 2020; 70: 31-46https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21586
-
Social determinants of well being. WHO. https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health#tab=tab_1. Accessed September 21, 2022.
-
The affect of social determinants of well being on emergency departments visits in a Medicaid pattern.
Ann Emerg Med. 2021; 77: 511-522https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.11.010
-
U.S. Preventive Companies Activity Pressure. Last suggestion assertion – colorectal most cancers: screening.
Preventive Companies Activity Pressure,
Rockville, MD: U.S2021 () -
U.S. Preventive Companies Activity Pressure. Last suggestion assertion – breast most cancers: screening.
Preventive Companies Activity Pressure,
Rockville, MD: U.S2016 () -
U.S. Preventive Companies Activity Pressure. Last suggestion assertion – cervical most cancers: screening.
Preventive Companies Activity Pressure,
Rockville, MD: U.S2018 () -
HEDIS measures and technical sources. Nationwide Committee for High quality Assurance. https://www.ncqa.org/hedis/measures/. Accessed August 9, 2022.
-
A conceptual framework for motion on the social determinants of well being: social determinants of well being dialogue paper 2 (coverage and observe).
WHO,
Geneva, SwitzerlandApril 5, 2011 () -
Space deprivation and widening inequalities in U.S. mortality, 1969–1998.
Am J Public Well being. 2003; 93: 1137-1143https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.93.7.1137
-
ACG® system model 12.0 system documentation (all guides).
Johns Hopkins College,
Baltimore, MD2019 () -
Breast most cancers screening amongst ladies with Medicaid, 2006–2008: a multilevel evaluation.
J Racial Ethn Well being Disparities. 2017; 4: 446-454https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-016-0245-9
-
Inspecting the affiliation of meals insecurity and being up-to-date for breast and colorectal most cancers screenings.
Most cancers Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022; 31: 1017-1025https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-1116
-
Colorectal most cancers screening: low well being literacy and restricted English proficiency amongst Asians and whites in California.
J Well being Commun. 2013; 18: 242-255https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.825669
-
Low well being literacy and most cancers screening amongst Chinese language People in California: a cross-sectional evaluation.
BMJ Open. 2015; 5e006104https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006104
-
Colorectal most cancers screening among the many homeless inhabitants of New York Metropolis shelter-based clinics.
Am J Public Well being. 2014; 104: 1307-1313https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301792
-
Affiliation of space socioeconomic standing and breast, cervical, and colorectal most cancers screening: a scientific evaluate.
Most cancers Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18: 2579-2599https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0135
-
Particular person- and county-level predictors of cervical most cancers screening: a multi-level evaluation.
Public Well being. 2018; 160: 116-124https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2018.03.026
-
Value-effectiveness of leveraging social determinants of well being to enhance breast, cervical, and colorectal most cancers screening: a scientific evaluate.
JAMA Oncol. 2020; 6: 1434-1444https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1460
Article data
Publication historical past
Printed on-line: March 11, 2023
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-Proof
Footnotes
No monetary disclosures have been reported by the authors of this paper.
Identification
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2023.02.005
Copyright
© 2023 American Journal of Preventive Drugs. Printed by Elsevier Inc.
Consumer license
Artistic Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
Permitted
For non-commercial functions:
- Learn, print & obtain
- Redistribute or republish the ultimate article
- Textual content & knowledge mine
- Translate the article (personal use solely, not for distribution)
- Reuse parts or extracts from the article in different works
Not Permitted
- Promote or re-use for industrial functions
- Distribute translations or variations of the article
Elsevier’s open entry license coverage
ScienceDirect
Entry this text on ScienceDirect